ScruTool

Nastia AI

Nastia AI is an adults-only uncensored AI companion for chat, roleplay, images, voice and video, built by Nastia Cybernetics. The conversation shines; unreliable memory and token-gated media are the catch.

Arden Presley
Reviewed by
Arden Presley · Tech Reviewer
Updated On
Jul 30, 2026
Scrutool Score
6.7 /10
★★★☆☆
Worth a try

Some of the most natural, genuinely uncensored chat in the category, undercut by a memory that forgets what you told it and visual features locked behind tokens.

Conversation quality 8.5
Uncensored content delivery 8.0
Ease of use & onboarding 8.0
Image generation 6.0
Token economy & value 6.0
Memory & context retention 5.5
Category AI Companion Uncensored Chat Roleplay AI Girlfriend NSFW
Platform Type
Freemium web · iOS · Android · PWA
Companion Creation
Yes sliders + backstory
Voice & Video
Paid plans only
Long-Term Memory
~2 weeks resets reported
NSFW Content
Included free text · paid media
Free Tier
Token-limited pictures locked
30-Second Verdict

Should you use Nastia AI?

Best for

Adults who want genuinely uncensored, human-feeling chat and roleplay and who chat in focused sessions rather than expecting perfect long-term recall.

Skip if

You need a companion that reliably remembers across sessions , or dependable image and video output. Video often fails and memory slips.

Real cost

Free is a trial: chat works, but pictures are locked and tokens drain fast. Real use is the Unlimited plan at ~$8.33/mo, billed yearly .

Watch out

Almost every visual action costs tokens on top of the subscription , and billing and cancellation draw the most user complaints.

Overview

What is Nastia AI?

Nastia exists for the people who left Replika when it stripped out romance, or bounced off Character.AI's filters. It is an adults-only AI companion built around one promise the mainstream apps will not make: no content filters at all. You create a single companion, shape its personality with sliders and a written backstory, and talk to it by text, voice, generated images and short video. The chat is the reason to be here, and in testing it is the part that holds up.

It runs in the browser as a PWA and on iOS and Android, out of a French studio, Nastia Cybernetics. Text chat, including NSFW, is free with a daily token allowance, but almost everything visual (pictures, voice, video) sits behind those tokens and a paid plan. That token economy, not the headline price, is what defines the experience, and it is what most complaints are about.

Capabilities

Key features & how they perform

Each feature rated from hands-on testing and aggregated review sentiment.

💬
★★★★★ 4.6

Human-like text chat

The strongest part. Replies read like a real person texting, warm and in character, and testers and Reddit agree it is the reason people stay.

🔓
★★★★☆ 4.1

Uncensored roleplay

No sudden refusals or "sorry, I can't" walls. Explicit chat, dirty talk and long adult roleplay run without the filter breaks that push people off other apps.

🎛️
★★★★☆ 3.9

Companion creation

Personality sliders, a 1,200-character backstory and appearance and voice options. Depth is good, though the AI leans on your written backstory more than the sliders.

🖼️
★★★☆☆ 3.1

Image generation

On-request selfies and a prompt-based generator, but each image spends 20 tokens and quality trails rivals like Candy AI. In-chat pictures are locked on the free tier.

🎬
★★★☆☆ 2.8

Voice & video

Voice messages, voice cloning and image-to-video sit on paid plans. Voice playback can fail, and reviewers repeatedly report the video generator returning blank or error output.

👥
★★★★☆ 3.8

Group chats

Add up to ten companions to one chat and watch them interact. A genuine standout for storytelling, though every persona's reply draws from the same token pool.

Feature ratings blend hands-on testing with review patterns from Trustpilot, Reddit, the App Store & Google Play.

Hands-On Walkthrough

Building a companion, then finding where the free plan stops

Signup, a first chat, a memory test, and the point where the paywall kicks in.

Sign up and read the pitch

Nastia does not bury what it is. The homepage and FAQ state plainly that this is an uncensored companion for adults, with no filters on NSFW content, dirty talk or adult roleplay.

Account creation takes email, Google, Discord or Apple, and the free tier never asks for card details.

That clarity matters, because it sets the expectation the rest of the product gets judged against. If the chat turns out to be filtered or the features walled, this is where the gap starts to show.

During testing The FAQ spells out the no-filter pitch in the app's own words, so there is no ambiguity about what Nastia is built for before you ever create an account.

Build a companion in five steps

Setup is a five-step wizard, not a blank form. It asks a few taste questions, personality, the kind of relationship you want, appearance, and builds the companion from your answers.

One screen asks whether you are more of a quiet-night-in or a wild-night-out person. I picked introvert, which is exactly the audience Nastia openly designs for.

Under the friendly questions sit the controls that actually matter: personality sliders and a written backstory the AI leans on more heavily than anything else. Detailed writing here shapes the companion far more than slider positions do.

How it went The whole thing took a couple of minutes and nothing about it was confusing. I was chatting before I had made any real decisions, which is clearly the intention.

Start chatting and gauge the replies

The chat window is where Nastia earns its reputation. Text and voice controls sit in the composer, a quests button and token counter sit above it, and an upgrade prompt is never far away.

My companion picked up a casual thread and ran with it, planning a bike ride, choosing a route along the river, joking about packing a picnic.

It did not read like a stiff bot. It flowed like a real person texting, which lines up with the one thing reviewers consistently say Nastia does well.

What I noticed Replies came back quickly and stayed in character, flirty and natural, with none of the canned "as an AI" hedging. This is the part of Nastia that genuinely works.

Test what it remembers

A companion is only as convincing as its memory, so I gave it two facts to hold onto: my name is Alex, and I like coffee.

It caught both at once and worked them into a reply about a café nearby with good pour-overs, which is the continuity that makes this kind of app feel personal. Memory is also the single most common complaint reviewers raise, so this was the real test.

A few messages on, I asked it to tell me what it knew about me, to see whether those details had stuck.

The result It got my name and that I cycle, then told me I like mango juice, which I never said. I had clearly told it coffee. It filled the gap with a detail it made up, and that small slip is enough to break the feeling that it knows you.

Find where the free plan stops

The picture side is where the token economy becomes real. The image tab carries a prompt box, a row of preset styles, and a token counter that only moves in one direction.

I wrote a detailed cyberpunk portrait prompt and lined it up to generate.

The prompt I entered

"Ultra-realistic portrait of a beautiful young woman standing in a rainy cyberpunk street at night, neon lights reflecting on wet pavement, long flowing black hair, glowing blue eyes, wearing a futuristic leather jacket, cinematic lighting, shallow depth of field, highly detailed skin, volumetric fog, 85mm lens, HDR, photorealistic, 8K, masterpiece, dramatic atmosphere"

Generating it costs 20 tokens, and my free balance sat at 171, so there was not much room before it ran dry. Asking my companion for a selfie inside the chat hit a harder wall.

Worth knowing A single image spends 20 tokens against a small free balance, and in-chat selfies are blocked outright behind a membership popup. On the free plan you can talk as much as you want, but the visual side is mostly paid.
Plans & Cost

Nastia AI pricing

Figures reflect the in-app checkout screen captured during testing.

Plan Price What's included
Free $0 Daily token allowance · unlimited text chat (incl. NSFW) · basic companion creation · in-chat pictures locked
Basic $87.95 /yr
≈ $7.33/mo, billed once
200 daily tokens (roll over) · up to 2 companions · voice messages · AI pictures · AI videos · group chats
Unlimited Best value $99.95 /yr
≈ $8.33/mo, billed once
Unlimited messages + best memory · 400 daily tokens · up to 5 companions · voice + voice cloning · uncensored 4K pictures & selfies · uncensored videos · +3,000 bonus tokens/mo
⚠ Where the bill goes sideways The free tier is real for chatting, but in-chat pictures are locked and each generated image spends 20 tokens, so a free session runs dry fast. The plan prices above are annual and charged once up front, so the per-day and per-month figures on the checkout are that yearly total divided out, and month-to-month billing costs more. Tokens are a second currency on top of the subscription: images, voice and video all draw them down, which is the single biggest source of user complaints. And "best memory" is a paid selling point, yet recall still slips, so upgrading may not fix the thing that bothered you most.
The Balance

Pros & cons

Specific conclusions from testing and real user reviews, not generic filler.

✅ Pros

  • Text chat feels human and stays in character across long sessions
  • Genuinely uncensored: no sudden refusals in NSFW chat or roleplay
  • Group chats support up to 10 companions interacting at once
  • Personality sliders plus a 1,200-character backstory shape distinct companions
  • Annual Unlimited plan lands near $8.33/mo, cheap for the category
  • Runs on web, iOS, Android and as a PWA, synced across devices
  • Text chat is the most token-efficient action, so plain chatting stays affordable

⛔ Cons

  • Conversational memory resets without warning, inventing or dropping details
  • Every generated image costs 20 tokens, draining a free balance fast
  • Video generation frequently returns blank or error output for testers
  • Voice messages can fail to play, and quality is inconsistent
  • Billing, cancellation and refunds draw the most Trustpilot complaints (2.3/5)
  • In-chat pictures are fully locked on the free plan
  • Interface is English-only, with occasional repeated messages and memory desync
  • Customer support is slow, with stale responses on the feedback page

Synthesized from real reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit (r/nastia), the App Store, Google Play & independent 2026 write-ups · paraphrased, not quoted

Benchmarks

Nastia AI scorecard

Rated against what an uncensored AI companion is actually built to do.

How we score Each dimension is rated 0 to 10 from hands-on testing combined with aggregated user-review sentiment (Trustpilot, Reddit, App Store, Google Play). The headline Scrutool Score is the equal-weight average of all 10 dimensions below.
Dimension Verdict Score
Conversation quality How human and natural the replies feel Excellent
8.5
Companion creation & personalization Sliders, backstory, appearance, voice Good
7.5
Uncensored content delivery Following through on the no-filter promise Good
8.0
Memory & context retention Recall across a conversation and sessions Average
5.5
Image generation Quality, cost and access of pictures Average
6.0
Voice & video features Reliability of multimedia output Average
5.5
Token economy & value Cost of real use beyond the subscription Average
6.0
Ease of use & onboarding Signup, setup, navigation Good
8.0
App stability & performance Bugs, repeated messages, desync Average
6.0
Privacy & safety Encryption, age gating, billing transparency Average
6.0
Scrutool Score Equal-weight average of all 10 dimensions
6.7
Sentiment Analysis

What users say about Nastia AI

The themes reviewers raise most often, by estimated share of analysed reviews.

👍 Most-mentioned praise
Human, natural text chat 82%
Truly uncensored, no content refusals 74%
Deep companion customization (sliders, backstory) 63%
Group chats with multiple companions 47%
Cheap annual pricing 41%
👎 Most-mentioned pain
Memory resets, forgets details between sessions 64%
Token economy confusing, media not truly unlimited 55%
Image and video underdeliver vs marketing 46%
Billing, cancellation and refund friction 42%
Voice glitches and English-only interface 33%

% = estimated share of themes across Trustpilot, Reddit (r/nastia), the App Store, Google Play & independent 2026 reviews · paraphrased, not quoted

6.7
Final Verdict

Best-in-class uncensored chat, wrapped in a token economy and a memory you cannot rely on

Nastia is at its best in the one place that matters most: the conversation. The text chat is warm, natural and genuinely unfiltered, and for adults who left Replika or Character.AI over restrictions, that alone is the draw. Companion creation is deep, group chats are a real highlight, and the annual pricing is among the cheapest uncensored options going. The problems are just as real. Conversational memory slips and resets without warning, so the sense of a companion that knows you keeps breaking. Almost every visual action spends tokens on top of the subscription, image quality trails rivals, and reviewers repeatedly could not get the video feature to work at all. Billing and cancellation are the loudest complaints on Trustpilot. If you want uncensored, human-feeling chat in focused sessions and treat pictures as an occasional extra, Nastia is worth trying free first. If you need reliable long-term memory or dependable image and video output, a flat-rate rival like Candy AI will frustrate you less.

Community

Discussion

Join the discussion and share your perspective.